Três problemas do recurso judicial ao direito comparado:
legitimidade, seletividade e deformidade
Palavras-chave:
Direito comparado; tribunais; legitimidade; seletividade; deformidadeResumo
A literatura jurídica documenta o crescente recurso de tribunais de diversos países ao direito comparado, em especial para ampliar a proteção a direitos fundamentais para além do explicitamente previsto no direito nacional. Ao menos duas circunstâncias contribuem para o crescente uso de direito comparado pelos tribunais: o fenômeno da globalização, com a consequente aproximação de tribunais de países distintos, e a complexização progressiva do processo decisório judicial. Este texto se destina à análise dos principais problemas associados a este aumento do recurso judicial ao direito comparado: (i) legitimidade; (ii) seletividade; e (iii) deformidade.
Referências
ADENAS, Mads; FAIRGRIEVE, Duncan, "Intent on making mischief: seven ways of using comparative law", in MONATERI, Pier Giuseppe (ed.), Methods of Comparative Law, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2012.
AUBY, Jean-Bernard, "Introduction", in MELLERAY, Fabrice (dir.), L'argument de droit comparé en droit administratif français, Bruxelles, Bruylant, 2007.
BRETONNEAU, A.; DAHAN, S.; FAIRGRIEVE, D., L’influence grandissante du droit comparé au Conseil d’État: vers une procédure juridictionnelle innovante?, RFDA 2015.
CALABRESI, Steven; ZIMDAHL, Stephanie Dotson. The Supreme Court and Foreign Sources of Law: two hundred years of practice and the juvenile death penalty decision. William and Mary Law Review, vol. 47, pp. 743-910, 2005.
CARROZA, Paolo. Uses and Misuses of Comparative Law in International Human Rights: Some Reflections on the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. Notre Dame Law School, Scholarly Works, paper 208, 1998.
DORSEN, Norman. The relevance of foreign legal materials in U.S. constitutional cases: A conversation between Justice Antonin Scalia and Justice Stephen Breyer. International Journal of Constitutional Law, vol. 3, 4, 2005.
EREZ-BARAK, Daphne. The Institutional Aspects of Comparative Law. Columbia Journal of European Law, vol. 15, pp. 477-493, 2009.
GELTER, Martin; SIEMS, Mathias. “Networks, Dialogue or One-Way Traffic? Na Empirical Analysis of Cross-Citations Between Tem of Europe’s Highest Courts”. Utrecht Law Review, vol. 8, pp. 88-99, 2012.
HIRSCHL, Han. Comparative Matters: The Renaissance of Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford: OUP, 2014, pp. 27-28.
KAHN-FREUND, Otto. On Uses and Misuses of Comparative Law. The Modern Law Review, vol. 37, 1974.
KOH, Harold Hongju. International Law as Part of Our Law. American Journal of International Law, vol. 98, 2004.
MAK, Elaine. “Reference to Foreign Law in the Supreme Courts of Britain and the Netherlands: Explaining the Development of Judicial Practices”. Utrecht Law Review, vol. 8, pp. 20-34, 2012.
MELLERAY, Fabrice. Les trois âges du droit administratif comparé ou comment l’argument de droit comparé a changé de sens en droit administratif français. In: MELLERAY, Fabrice (Dir.). L’argument de droit comparé en droit administratif français. Bruxelles: Bruylant, 2007.
PLATON, Sébastien. "L’argument de droit comparé dans les débats relatifs à la dualité de juridictions", in MELLERAY, Fabrice (dir.), L'argument de droit comparé en droit administratif français, Bruxelles, Bruylant, 2007.
SAUVÉ, Jean-Marc. Le Conseil d’État et la Comparaison des Droits. Palestra realizada em 14 de fevereiro de 2014.
STEIN, Eric. Uses, Misuses – And Nonuses of Comparative Law. Northwestern University Law Review, vol. 72, pp. 198-216, 1977.
WALDRON, Jeremy. Foreign Law and the Modern Ius Gentium, Harvard Law Review, 119, p. 129, 2005.
WATSON, Alan. Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press, 1974.
ZARING, David. The Use of Foreign Decisions by Federal Courts: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, vol. 03, pp. 297-331, 2006.
AUBY, Jean-Bernard, "Introduction", in MELLERAY, Fabrice (dir.), L'argument de droit comparé en droit administratif français, Bruxelles, Bruylant, 2007.
BRETONNEAU, A.; DAHAN, S.; FAIRGRIEVE, D., L’influence grandissante du droit comparé au Conseil d’État: vers une procédure juridictionnelle innovante?, RFDA 2015.
CALABRESI, Steven; ZIMDAHL, Stephanie Dotson. The Supreme Court and Foreign Sources of Law: two hundred years of practice and the juvenile death penalty decision. William and Mary Law Review, vol. 47, pp. 743-910, 2005.
CARROZA, Paolo. Uses and Misuses of Comparative Law in International Human Rights: Some Reflections on the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. Notre Dame Law School, Scholarly Works, paper 208, 1998.
DORSEN, Norman. The relevance of foreign legal materials in U.S. constitutional cases: A conversation between Justice Antonin Scalia and Justice Stephen Breyer. International Journal of Constitutional Law, vol. 3, 4, 2005.
EREZ-BARAK, Daphne. The Institutional Aspects of Comparative Law. Columbia Journal of European Law, vol. 15, pp. 477-493, 2009.
GELTER, Martin; SIEMS, Mathias. “Networks, Dialogue or One-Way Traffic? Na Empirical Analysis of Cross-Citations Between Tem of Europe’s Highest Courts”. Utrecht Law Review, vol. 8, pp. 88-99, 2012.
HIRSCHL, Han. Comparative Matters: The Renaissance of Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford: OUP, 2014, pp. 27-28.
KAHN-FREUND, Otto. On Uses and Misuses of Comparative Law. The Modern Law Review, vol. 37, 1974.
KOH, Harold Hongju. International Law as Part of Our Law. American Journal of International Law, vol. 98, 2004.
MAK, Elaine. “Reference to Foreign Law in the Supreme Courts of Britain and the Netherlands: Explaining the Development of Judicial Practices”. Utrecht Law Review, vol. 8, pp. 20-34, 2012.
MELLERAY, Fabrice. Les trois âges du droit administratif comparé ou comment l’argument de droit comparé a changé de sens en droit administratif français. In: MELLERAY, Fabrice (Dir.). L’argument de droit comparé en droit administratif français. Bruxelles: Bruylant, 2007.
PLATON, Sébastien. "L’argument de droit comparé dans les débats relatifs à la dualité de juridictions", in MELLERAY, Fabrice (dir.), L'argument de droit comparé en droit administratif français, Bruxelles, Bruylant, 2007.
SAUVÉ, Jean-Marc. Le Conseil d’État et la Comparaison des Droits. Palestra realizada em 14 de fevereiro de 2014.
STEIN, Eric. Uses, Misuses – And Nonuses of Comparative Law. Northwestern University Law Review, vol. 72, pp. 198-216, 1977.
WALDRON, Jeremy. Foreign Law and the Modern Ius Gentium, Harvard Law Review, 119, p. 129, 2005.
WATSON, Alan. Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press, 1974.
ZARING, David. The Use of Foreign Decisions by Federal Courts: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, vol. 03, pp. 297-331, 2006.
Downloads
Publicado
2020-03-18
Como Citar
Jordão, E. (2020). Três problemas do recurso judicial ao direito comparado:: legitimidade, seletividade e deformidade. Revista Brasileira De Direitos Fundamentais & Justiça, 13(41), 319–339. Recuperado de https://dfj.emnuvens.com.br/dfj/article/view/785
Edição
Seção
DOUTRINA NACIONAL
Licença
Para acesso ao conteúdo do periódico, favor entrar em contato com:
Editora Fórum
0800 704 3737
vendas@editoraforum.com.br
