DEMOCRACIA, MÍDIAS SOCIAIS E LIBERDADE DE EXPRESSÃO: ÓDIO, MENTIRAS E A BUSCA DA VERDADE POSSÍVEL
Palavras-chave:
redes sociais, democracia, Liberdade de ExpressãoResumo
Este artigo é uma reflexão crítica sobre o impacto da revolução digital e da Internet em três tópicos que moldam o mundo contemporâneo: democracia, mídias sociais e liberdade de expressão. O Capítulo I estabelece alguns pressupostos históricos e conceituais sobre a democracia constitucional e discute o momento atual de recessão democrática, bem como o uso das plataformas digitais como estratégia de poder. O Capítulo II discute as plataformas de mídia social e a forma como revolucionaram a comunicação interpessoal e social, democratizando o acesso ao conhecimento e à informação, mas também levando a uma disseminação exponencial de desinformação, discursos de ódio e teorias conspiratórias. O Capítulo III propõe um quadro regulatório para a disciplina das plataformas digitais, sensível à importância de encontrar o equilíbrio certo com o direito fundamental contraposto, que é a liberdade de expressão, essencial para a dignidade humana, para a busca da verdade possível e para a democracia. O Capítulo IV destaca o papel da sociedade e a importância da educação midiática para criar um ambiente livre, mas positivo e construtivo na Internet. Por fim, o Capítulo V comenta brevemente novos desenvolvimentos importantes quando o artigo já se encontrava em vias de publicação.
Referências
A GLOBAL dialogue to guide regulation worldwide. Unesco, 2023. Disponível em: "https://www.unesco.org/en/internet-conference"https://www.unesco.org/en/internet-conference. Acesso em: 8 mai. 2023.
AUDITING Algorithms: the existing landscape, role of regulator and future outlook. Digital Regulation Cooperation Forum, 23 set. 2022. Disponível em: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/auditing-algorithms-the-existing-landscape-role-of-regulators-and-future-outlook. Acesso em: 07 mai. 2023.
BALKIN, Jack M. Free Speech is a Triangle. Columbia Law Review, v. 118, n. 7, 2018, p. 2011-2056. Disponível em: https://columbialawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Balkin-FREE_SPEECH_IS_A_TRIANGLE.pdf. Acesso em: 5 mai. 2023.
BALKIN, Jack M. How to Regulate (and Not Regulate) Social Media. Journal of Free Speech Law, v. 71, 2021, Knight Institute Occasional Paper Series, n. 1, March 2020, Yale Law School, Public Law Research Paper Forthcoming, 20 nov. 2019. Disponível em: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3484114. Acesso em: 7 mai. 2023.
BALKIN, Jack M. Free speech in the algorithmic society: big data, private governance, and new school speech regulation. University of California, Davis, v. 51, 2018, p. 1149-1210. Disponível em: https://lawreview.law.ucdavis.edu/issues/51/3/Essays/51-3_Balkin.pdf. Acesso em: 7 mai. 2023.
BALZ, Dan. A Year After Jan. 6, Are the guardrails that protect democracy real or illusory? The Washington Post, Washington, 6 jan. 2022. Disponível em: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/democracy-january-6/2022/01/06/2a1fc41e-6db4-11ec-a5d2-7712163262f0_story.html. Acesso em: 5 mai. 2023.
BARROSO, Luís Roberto. O constitucionalismo democrático ou neoconstitucionalismo como ideologia vitoriosa do século XX. Revista Publicum., v. 4, 2018.
BARROSO, Luís Roberto. Technological Revolution, Democratic Recession and Climate Change: The Limits of Law in a Changing World. International Journal of Constitutional Law, v.18, 2020.
BARROSO, Luna van Brussel. Liberdade de Expressão e Democracia na Era Digital: O impacto das mídias sociais no mundo contemporâneo. Belo Horizonte: Forum, 2022.
BEYER, R.. Can we fix what’s wrong with social media? Yale Law Report, verão de 2022.
BREXIT: Reaction from around the UK, BBC, Londres, 24 jun. 2016. Disponível em: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-eu-referendum-36619444. Acesso em: 5 mai. 2023.
BUCKMAN, Ian. Hashing it out: how an automated crackdown on child pornography is shaping the Fourth Amendment. Berkeley Journal of Criminal Law, Berkeley, 13 abr. 2021. Disponível em: https://www.bjcl.org/blog/hashing-it-out-how-an-automated-crackdown-on-child-pornography-is-shaping-the-fourth-amendment/. Acesso em: 7 mai. 2023.
DIAMOND, Larry. Facing up to the Democratic Recession. Journal of Democracy, v. 26, 2015.
DICHO, Michael; LOGVINENKO, Igor. Authoritarian Populism, Courts and Democratic Erosion. Just Security, 11 fev. 2021. Disponível em: https://www.justsecurity.org/74624/authoritarian-populism-courts-and-democratic-erosion/. Acesso em: 5 mai. 2023.
DOUEK, Evelyn. Content Moderation as Systems Thinking. Harvard Law Review, v. 2, 2022, p. 136. Disponível em: https://harvardlawreview.org/2022/12/content-moderation-as-systems-thinking/. Acesso em: 08 mai. 2023.
DOUEK, Evelyn. Governing online speech. Columbia Law Review, v. 121, n. 03, 2021. Disponível em: https://columbialawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Douek-Governing_Online_Speech-from_Posts_As-Trumps_To_Proportionality_And_Probability.pdf. Acesso em: 7 mai. 2023.
DWORKIN, Ronald. Is Democracy Possible Here? Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.
DWORKIN, Ronald. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1997.
ECPS - European Center for Populism Studies. Digital Populism. Disponível em: https://www.populismstudies.org/Vocabulary/digital-populism/. Acesso em: 5 mai. 2023.
ELKIN-KOREN, Niva; PEREL, Maayan. Speech Contestation by Design: Democratizing Speech Governance by AI. Florida State University Law Review (forthcoming). Disponível em: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4129341https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4129341. Acesso em: 5 mai. 2023.
ENGESSER, Sven et al. Populism and Social Media: How Politicians Spread a Fragmented Ideology. Information, Communication & Society, v. 20, 2017.
FACEBOOK statistics and trends. Datareportal, 19 fev. 2023. Disponível em: https://datareportal.com/essential-facebook-stats. Acesso em: 8 mai. 2023.
FAUSTO, Sergio. O desafio democrático. Revista Piauí, v. 8, 2022.
FUSSEL, Sidney. Why the New Zealand shooting video keeps circulating. The Atlantic, 21 mar. 2019. Disponível em: https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2019/03/facebook-youtube-new-zealand-tragedy-video/585418/. Acesso em: 7 mai. 2023.
GLOBAL Charter of Ethics for Journalists, The International Federation of Journalists (Junho de 2019). Disponível em: https://perma.cc/7A2C-JD2S. Acesso em: 5 mai. 2023.
GOLDSTEIN, Ariel. Brazil leads the third wave of the Latin American far right, C-REX - Center for Research on Extremism, 1º mar. 2021. Disponível em: https://www.sv.uio.no/c-rex/english/news-and-events/right-now/2021/brazil-leads-the-third-wave-of-the-latin-american-.html. Acesso em: 5 mai. 2023.
HAIDT, Jonathan. Why the past 10 years of American life have been uniquely stupid. The Atlantic. Disponível em: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2022/05/social-media-democracy-trust-babel/629369/. Acesso em: 08 mai. 2023.
HUMAN Rights Committee, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression. 11 de maio de 2016. UN Doc A/HRC/32/38. Disponível em: https://undocs.org/en/A/HRC/32/38. Acesso em: 8 mai. 2023.
HUQ, Aziz; GINSBURG, Tom. How to Lose a Constitutional Democracy. UCLA Law Review, v. 65, 2018.
ISSACHAROFF, Samuel. Fragile Democracies: Contested Power in the Era of Constitutional Courts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
JACKSON, Vicki C. Knowledge institutions in constitutional democracies: reflections on the “press”. The Jorunal of Meida Law, v. 14, 2022. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/17577632.2022.2142733. Acesso em: 05 mai. 2023.
JONES, Seth G. The rise of far-right extremism in the United States, Center for Strategic & International Studies, novembro de 2018. Disponível em: https://www.csis.org/analysis/rise-far-right-extremism-united-states. Acesso em: 5 mai. 2023.
KADRI, Thomas E.; KLONICK, Kate. Facebook v. Sullivan: public figures and newsworthiness in online speech. Southern California Law Review, v. 93, 2019. Disponível em: https://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/faculty_publications/292/. Acesso em: 5 mai. 2023.
KELLER, Daphne. Some humility about transparency. The Center for Internet and Society Blog, 19 de mar. 2021. Disponível em: https://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/blog/2021/03/some-humility-about-transparency. Acesso em: 7 mai. 2023.
KLONICK, Kate. The new governors: the people, rules, and processes governing online speech. Harvard Law Review, v. 131, 2018, p. 1598-1670. Disponível em: https://harvardlawreview.org/2018/04/the-new-governors-the-people-rules-and-processes-governing-online-speech/. Acesso em: 7 mai. 2023.
KOSHIYAMA, Adriano; KAZIM, Emre; TRELEAVEN, Philip. Algorithm Auditing: Managing the Legal, Ethical, and Technological Risks of Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Associated Algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society, v. 3, Apr. 2022 p. 128-142. Disponível em: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9755237. Acesso em: 08 mai. 2023.
KUO, Ming-Sung. Against instantaneous democracy. International Journal of Constitutional Law, v. 17, 2019, p. 554-575. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moz029. Acesso em: 5 mai. 2023.
LANDAU, David. Abusive Constitutionalism. U.C. Davis Law Review, v. 47, 2013.
LARSON, Erik J. The Myth of Artificial Intelligence: Why Computers Can’t Think the Way We Do. Belknap Press, abril de 2021.
LEERSSEN, Paddy. The soap box as a black box: regulating transparency in social media recommender systems. European Journal of Law and Technology, v. 11, 2020. Disponível em: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3544009. Acesso em: 7 mai. 2023.
LEIDIG, Eviane. Hindutva as a Variant of Right-Wing Extremism, Patterns of Prejudice, v. 54, n. 3, 2020, p. 215-237.
LESSIG, Lawrence. They don't represent us: reclaiming our democracy. Providence: Dey Street Books, 2019.
LEVITSKY, Steven; WAY, Lucan A. The rise of competitive authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy, v.13, 2002.
MACCARTHY, Mark. Transparency requirements for digital social media platforms: recommendations for policy makers and industry. Transatlantic Working Group, 24 jun. 2020. Disponível em: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3615726 ou http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3615726. Acesso em: 8 mai. 2023.
MAGARIAN, Gregory P. A Internet e as Mídias Sociais. In: STONE, Adrienne; SCHAUER, Frederick. Liberdade de Expressão. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.
MESEROLE, Chris. "How do recommender systems work on digital platforms?" Tech Stream, Brookings, 21 de set de 2022. Disponível em: https://www.brookings.edu/techstream/how-do-recommender-systems-work-on-digital-platforms-social-media-recommendation-algorithms/. Acesso em: 5 mai. 2023.
MINOW, Martha. Saving the Press: why the Constitution calls for government action to preserve freedom of speech. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.
MINOW, Martha. Saving the Press, 2021.
MUDDE, Cas. The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, v. 39, 2004.
NAHMIAS, Yifat; PEREL, Maayan. The oversight of content moderation by AI: impact assessment and their limitations. Harvard Journal on Legislation,v. 58, 2021. Disponível em: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3565025. Acesso em: 08 mai. 2023.
ORWA, Robert; BINNS, Reuben; KATZENBACH, Christian. Moderação de conteúdo algorítmico: desafios técnicos e políticos na automação da governança de plataformas. Big Data & Society, vol. 7, 2020, p. 1-15. Disponível em: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2053951719897945. Acesso em: 7 mai. 2023.
RUSSELL, Stuart. Human Compatible: Artificial Intelligence and the Problem of Control. N. York, Penguin Books, 2019.
SCHEPPELE, Kim Lane. Autocratic Legalism. University of Chicago Law Review, v. 85, 2018.
SCHWAB, Klaus. A Quarta Revolução Industrial. Trad. Cássio Leite Vieira. v. 1. ed. São Paulo: Edipro, 2018.
SHAFFER, Kris. Data versus democracy: how big data algorithms shape opinions and alter the course of history. Colorado: Apress, 2019.
SIYECH, Mohammed Sinan. An Introduction to Right-Wing Extremism in India, New Eng. J. Pub. Pol. 1, 2021.
THAKUR, Dhanaraj; LLANSÓ, Emma. Do you see what I see? capabilities and limits of automated multimedia content analysis. Center for Democracy & Technology, Washington, 20 de mai de 2021. Disponível em: https://cdt.org/insights/do-you-see-what-i-see-capabilities-and-limits-of-automated-multimedia-content-analysis/. Acesso em: 7 mai. 2023.
WHATSAPP 2023 User Statistics: How Many People Use WhatsApp? Backlinko, 5 jan. 2023. Disponível em: https://backlinko.com/whatsapp-users. Acesso em: 8 mai. 2023.
WOOLDRIDGE, Michael. A Brief History of Artificial Intelligence: What It Is, Where We Are, and Where We Are Going. New York: Flatiron Book, jan 2021.
WPFD 2021: Attacks on Press Freedom Growing Bolder Amid Rising Authoritarianism. International Press Institute, 30 abr. 2021. Disponível em: https://ipi.media/wpfd-2021-attacks-on-press-freedom-growing-bolder-amid-rising-authoritarianism/. Acesso em: 5 mai. 2023.
WU, Tim. Is the First Amendment Obsolete?. In: POZEN, David E. (Ed.). The Perilous Public Square. N. York: Columbia University Press, 2020. E-book Kindle.
YOUTUBE User Statistic. Global Media Insight, 27 fev. 2023. Disponível em: https://www.globalmediainsight.com/blog/youtube-users-statistics/. Acesso em: 8 mai. 2023.
ZAKARIA, Fareed. The rise of illiberal democracies. Foreign Affairs 76:22, 1997.
ZITTRAIN, Jonathan. Answering impossible questions: content governance in an age of disinformation. Harvard Kennedy School – Misinformation Review, 4 jan. 2020. Disponível em: https://misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/article/content-governance-in-an-age-of-disinformation/. Acesso em: 8 mai. 2023.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Brasileira de Direitos Fundamentais & Justiça
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Para acesso ao conteúdo do periódico, favor entrar em contato com:
Editora Fórum
0800 704 3737
vendas@editoraforum.com.br
