A Convenção Europeia de Direitos Humanos - Uma Constituição para a Europa?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30899/dfj.v14i42.897Palavras-chave:
Convenção Europeia de Direitos Humanos, Direito Internacional, Constituição Europeia, Direitos Humanos, ConstitucionalizaçãoResumo
Em retrospectiva, apresenta-se como surpreendente o ceticismo inicial constatado diante da Convenção Europeia de Direitos Humanos e do novo sistema engendrado para a proteção de direitos humanos. Por contingências históricas favoráveis, seu desenvolvimento superou todas as expectativas. A jurisprudência mostrou elementos revolucionários, os quais podem ser vistos como indicativos de uma constitucionalização. Muito embora a CEDH trate igualmente sobre a proteção da democracia e do Estado de Direito no contexto dos direitos humanos, ela, contudo, não pode ser considerada uma Constituição para a Europa.
Referências
Referências
ASCHE, Josephine. Die Margin of Appreciation. Berlim: Springer, 2018.
BATES, Ed. The evolution of the European Convention on Human Rights. From its inception to the creation
of a permanent Court of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
BESSON, Samantha. The extraterritoriality of the European Convention on Human Rights. Leiden Journal
of International Law, v. 25, 2012.
BHUTA, Nehal (Org.). The frontiers of human rights: extraterritoriality and its challenges. Oxford: Oxford
University Press, 2016.
Biaggini EuGRZ 2014, 29.
Binder, JRP 2015, 1.
BRATZA, Niklas. European Human Rights Law Review, Oxford, v. 2, 2014.
BREUER, Marten. Principled resistance against ECtHR judgments – A new paradigm? Berlim: Springer,
2019.
CHURCHILL, Winston. Discurso para a juventude acadêmica de 19 de setembro de 1946. Disponível
em: https://rm.coe.int/16806981f3.
DOTHAN, Shai. Judicial deference allows European Consensus to Emerge. Chicago Journal of International
Law, v. 18, 2018.
DRÖGE, Cordula. Positive Verpflichtungen der Staaten der Europäischen Menschenrechtskonvention.
Berlim: Springer, 2003.
DZEHTSIAROU, Kanstantsin. European consensus and the legitimacy of the European Court of Human
Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
FLEIG-GOLDSTEIN, Rachel M. The Russian Constitutional Court versus the European Court of Human
Rights. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, v. 56, n. 1, 2017.
FROWEIN, Jochen. European integration through fundamental rights. Michigan Journal of Law Reform, Ann
Arbor, v. 18, n. 1, p. 5-27, 1984. Disponível em: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjlr/vol18/iss1/2/.
GERARDS, Janneke; BREMS, Eva (Org.). Procedural review in European fundamental rights cases.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
GLENDON, Mary Ann. A world made new: Eleonor Roosevelt and the Universal Declaration of Human
Rights. New York: Random House Trade, 2001.
GREER, S. C. The Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights: Universal principle or
margin of appreciation? UCL Human Rights Review, Oxford, v. 3, 2010.
Hartwig EuGRZ 2017, 1.
HENNE, Thomas; RIEDLINGER, Arne (Hrsg.). Das Lüth-Urteil aus (rechts-) historischer Sicht: die Konflikte
umVeit Harlan und die Grundrechtsjudikatur des Bundesverfassungsgerichts, 2005.
Hilary Term [2019] UKSC 2, 30. 1. 2019.
JANKOWSKA-GILBERG, Magdalena. Extraterritorialität der Menschenrechte. Berlim: Nomos
Verlagsgesellschaft, 2008.
KELLER, Helen; WALTHER, Reto. The bell of Görgülü can’t be unrung – can it. The Global Community
Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence, 2020.
Keller/Kühne ZaöRV 2016, 245 – 307.
Keller/Kühne ZaöRV 2016, 245, 293.
Klatt ZaöRV 2011, 691.
KLEINLEIN, Thomas. Consensus and Contestability: The ECtHR and the Combined Potential of European
Consensus and Procedural Rationality Control. European Journal of International Law, v. 28, 2017.
Krieger ZaöRV 2014, 187.
LAUTERPACHT, Sir Hersch. An International Bill of the Rights of Man. New York: Columbia University
Press, 1945.
LEGG, Andrew. The Margin of Appreciation in International Human Rights Law: Deference and
Proportionality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
LETSAS. In: ETINSON, Adam (Org.). Human rights: moral or political? Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.
MACMILLAN, Margaret. Peacemaker: six months that changed the world. London: John Murray, 2003.
MALKSOO, Lauri. Russia’s Constitutional Court Defies the European Court of Human Rights. European
Constitutional Law Review, Cambridge, v. 12, 2016.
ILANOVIC, Marko. Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties. Oxford: Oxford University
Press, 2011.
MILANOVIC, Marko. From Compromise to Principle. Human Rights Law Review, v. 8, 2008.
MILANOVIC, Marko; PAPIC, Tatjana. The applicability of the ECHR in contested territories. International
and Comparative Law Quaterly, v. 67, 2018.
MOWBRAY, Alastair. The development of positive obligations under the European Convention on Human
Rights by the European Court of Human Rights. New York: Hart Publishing, 2004.
MOYN, Samuel. The Last Utopia: Human Rights in History. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2012.
MÜLLER, Amrei. Judicial Dialogue and Human Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
Nußberger RW 2012, 197.
NUßBERGER, Angelika. The Concept of ‘Jurisdiction’ in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human
Rights. Current Legal Problems, v. 65, 2012.
POPELIER, Patricia; LAMBRECHT, Sarah; LEMMENS, Koen (Org.). Criticism of the European Court of
Human Rights. Cambridge: Intersentia, 2016.
PUBLIC PAPERS OF THE PRESIDENTS OF THE UNITED STATES. Jimmy Carter: 1977, v. 1. Washington
D.C.: GPO, 1977. Disponível em: https://quod.lib.umich.edu/p/ppotpus?key=title;page=browse;value=j.
RÜTTGERS, Jürgen; DECKER, Frank (Org.). Europas Ende, Europas Anfang. Neue Perspektiven für die
Europäische Union. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag, 2017.
Schaefer EuR 2017, 80-106.
SLOTERDIJK, Peter. Zorn und Zeit. Berlim: Suhrkamp Verlag, 2016.
SPANO, Robert. The European Court of Human Rights and National Courts. Nordic Journal of Human
Rights, v. 33, 2015.
SPANO, Robert. The Future of the European Court of Human Rights. Subsidiarity, Process-Based Review
and the Rule of Law. Human Rights Law Review, v. 18, 2018.
STOCK, G.; MARKSCHIES, C.; HAUER, S. (Org.). Zukunftsort: Europa. Berlim: De Gruyter, 2015.
STONE-SWEET, Alec; KELLER, Helen (Org.). A Europe of Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
STOYANOVA, Vladislava. The Disjunctive Structure of Positive Rights under the European Convention on
Human Rights. Nordic Journal of International Law, v. 87, 2018.
TERHECHTE, Jörg Philipp. Konstitutionalisierung und Normativität der europäischen Grundrechte.
Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2011.
TITIUN, Patrick (Org.). La conscience de droits: Mélanges en l’honneur de Jean-Paul Costa. Paris: Dalloz,
2011.
Tomuschat EuGRZ 2003, 95-100.
Unger-Sternberg AVR 2013, 312.
Voßkuhle NVwZ 2010, 1.
Walter ZaöRV 1999, 962, 966 e ss.
Walter ZaöRV 1999, 962-983.
XENOS, Dimitris. The positive obligations of the state under the European Convention of Human Rights.
Oxfordshire: Routledge, 2013.
ZaöRV 2015, 753-770.
ZUBIK, Marek (Org.). Human Rights in Contemporary World. Essays in Honour of Professor Leszek Garlicki.
Warschau: Wydawnictwo Sejmowe, 2017.
ASCHE, Josephine. Die Margin of Appreciation. Berlim: Springer, 2018.
BATES, Ed. The evolution of the European Convention on Human Rights. From its inception to the creation
of a permanent Court of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
BESSON, Samantha. The extraterritoriality of the European Convention on Human Rights. Leiden Journal
of International Law, v. 25, 2012.
BHUTA, Nehal (Org.). The frontiers of human rights: extraterritoriality and its challenges. Oxford: Oxford
University Press, 2016.
Biaggini EuGRZ 2014, 29.
Binder, JRP 2015, 1.
BRATZA, Niklas. European Human Rights Law Review, Oxford, v. 2, 2014.
BREUER, Marten. Principled resistance against ECtHR judgments – A new paradigm? Berlim: Springer,
2019.
CHURCHILL, Winston. Discurso para a juventude acadêmica de 19 de setembro de 1946. Disponível
em: https://rm.coe.int/16806981f3.
DOTHAN, Shai. Judicial deference allows European Consensus to Emerge. Chicago Journal of International
Law, v. 18, 2018.
DRÖGE, Cordula. Positive Verpflichtungen der Staaten der Europäischen Menschenrechtskonvention.
Berlim: Springer, 2003.
DZEHTSIAROU, Kanstantsin. European consensus and the legitimacy of the European Court of Human
Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
FLEIG-GOLDSTEIN, Rachel M. The Russian Constitutional Court versus the European Court of Human
Rights. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, v. 56, n. 1, 2017.
FROWEIN, Jochen. European integration through fundamental rights. Michigan Journal of Law Reform, Ann
Arbor, v. 18, n. 1, p. 5-27, 1984. Disponível em: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjlr/vol18/iss1/2/.
GERARDS, Janneke; BREMS, Eva (Org.). Procedural review in European fundamental rights cases.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
GLENDON, Mary Ann. A world made new: Eleonor Roosevelt and the Universal Declaration of Human
Rights. New York: Random House Trade, 2001.
GREER, S. C. The Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights: Universal principle or
margin of appreciation? UCL Human Rights Review, Oxford, v. 3, 2010.
Hartwig EuGRZ 2017, 1.
HENNE, Thomas; RIEDLINGER, Arne (Hrsg.). Das Lüth-Urteil aus (rechts-) historischer Sicht: die Konflikte
umVeit Harlan und die Grundrechtsjudikatur des Bundesverfassungsgerichts, 2005.
Hilary Term [2019] UKSC 2, 30. 1. 2019.
JANKOWSKA-GILBERG, Magdalena. Extraterritorialität der Menschenrechte. Berlim: Nomos
Verlagsgesellschaft, 2008.
KELLER, Helen; WALTHER, Reto. The bell of Görgülü can’t be unrung – can it. The Global Community
Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence, 2020.
Keller/Kühne ZaöRV 2016, 245 – 307.
Keller/Kühne ZaöRV 2016, 245, 293.
Klatt ZaöRV 2011, 691.
KLEINLEIN, Thomas. Consensus and Contestability: The ECtHR and the Combined Potential of European
Consensus and Procedural Rationality Control. European Journal of International Law, v. 28, 2017.
Krieger ZaöRV 2014, 187.
LAUTERPACHT, Sir Hersch. An International Bill of the Rights of Man. New York: Columbia University
Press, 1945.
LEGG, Andrew. The Margin of Appreciation in International Human Rights Law: Deference and
Proportionality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
LETSAS. In: ETINSON, Adam (Org.). Human rights: moral or political? Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.
MACMILLAN, Margaret. Peacemaker: six months that changed the world. London: John Murray, 2003.
MALKSOO, Lauri. Russia’s Constitutional Court Defies the European Court of Human Rights. European
Constitutional Law Review, Cambridge, v. 12, 2016.
ILANOVIC, Marko. Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties. Oxford: Oxford University
Press, 2011.
MILANOVIC, Marko. From Compromise to Principle. Human Rights Law Review, v. 8, 2008.
MILANOVIC, Marko; PAPIC, Tatjana. The applicability of the ECHR in contested territories. International
and Comparative Law Quaterly, v. 67, 2018.
MOWBRAY, Alastair. The development of positive obligations under the European Convention on Human
Rights by the European Court of Human Rights. New York: Hart Publishing, 2004.
MOYN, Samuel. The Last Utopia: Human Rights in History. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2012.
MÜLLER, Amrei. Judicial Dialogue and Human Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
Nußberger RW 2012, 197.
NUßBERGER, Angelika. The Concept of ‘Jurisdiction’ in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human
Rights. Current Legal Problems, v. 65, 2012.
POPELIER, Patricia; LAMBRECHT, Sarah; LEMMENS, Koen (Org.). Criticism of the European Court of
Human Rights. Cambridge: Intersentia, 2016.
PUBLIC PAPERS OF THE PRESIDENTS OF THE UNITED STATES. Jimmy Carter: 1977, v. 1. Washington
D.C.: GPO, 1977. Disponível em: https://quod.lib.umich.edu/p/ppotpus?key=title;page=browse;value=j.
RÜTTGERS, Jürgen; DECKER, Frank (Org.). Europas Ende, Europas Anfang. Neue Perspektiven für die
Europäische Union. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag, 2017.
Schaefer EuR 2017, 80-106.
SLOTERDIJK, Peter. Zorn und Zeit. Berlim: Suhrkamp Verlag, 2016.
SPANO, Robert. The European Court of Human Rights and National Courts. Nordic Journal of Human
Rights, v. 33, 2015.
SPANO, Robert. The Future of the European Court of Human Rights. Subsidiarity, Process-Based Review
and the Rule of Law. Human Rights Law Review, v. 18, 2018.
STOCK, G.; MARKSCHIES, C.; HAUER, S. (Org.). Zukunftsort: Europa. Berlim: De Gruyter, 2015.
STONE-SWEET, Alec; KELLER, Helen (Org.). A Europe of Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
STOYANOVA, Vladislava. The Disjunctive Structure of Positive Rights under the European Convention on
Human Rights. Nordic Journal of International Law, v. 87, 2018.
TERHECHTE, Jörg Philipp. Konstitutionalisierung und Normativität der europäischen Grundrechte.
Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2011.
TITIUN, Patrick (Org.). La conscience de droits: Mélanges en l’honneur de Jean-Paul Costa. Paris: Dalloz,
2011.
Tomuschat EuGRZ 2003, 95-100.
Unger-Sternberg AVR 2013, 312.
Voßkuhle NVwZ 2010, 1.
Walter ZaöRV 1999, 962, 966 e ss.
Walter ZaöRV 1999, 962-983.
XENOS, Dimitris. The positive obligations of the state under the European Convention of Human Rights.
Oxfordshire: Routledge, 2013.
ZaöRV 2015, 753-770.
ZUBIK, Marek (Org.). Human Rights in Contemporary World. Essays in Honour of Professor Leszek Garlicki.
Warschau: Wydawnictwo Sejmowe, 2017.
Downloads
Publicado
2020-08-10
Como Citar
Nussberger, A. (2020). A Convenção Europeia de Direitos Humanos - Uma Constituição para a Europa?. Revista Brasileira De Direitos Fundamentais & Justiça, 14(42), 49–73. https://doi.org/10.30899/dfj.v14i42.897
Edição
Seção
DOUTRINA ESTRANGEIRA
Licença
Para acesso ao conteúdo do periódico, favor entrar em contato com:
Editora Fórum
0800 704 3737
vendas@editoraforum.com.br
