Parâmetros deliberativos para os diálogos constitucionais
Razão pública, ética do discurso e backlash
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30899/dfj.v7i25.236Palavras-chave:
Diálogos Constitutionais, Democracia Deliberativa, Razão Pública, Ética do Discurso, Opinião PúblicaResumo
O presente estudo tem como objetivo analisar o tema da jurisdição constitucional por meio de uma das teses mais relevantes apresentadas acerca dessa temática: a dos diálogos constitucionais. Pretende-se abordar as principais linhas características da tese dos diálogos, e apontar a necessidade de parâmetros deliberativos como uma premissa fundamental para o funcionamento da democracia constitucional dialógica. Para tanto, buscamos identificar alguns parâmetros que podem contribuir para a tese dos diálogos: a razão pública, a ética do discurso e a opinião pública.
Referências
BATEUP, Christine. “The Dialogic Promise. Assessing the Normative Potential of Theories of Constitutional Dialogue.” Brooklyn Law Review, Vol. 71, 3, 2006.
BICKEL, Alexander. The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986.
COHEN, Jean; ARATO, Andrew. Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992.
COHEN, Joshua. The Arc of the Moral Universe and other Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011.
DAHL, Robert. “Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as National Policy-Maker.” Journal of Public Law, nº 6, 1957.
FRIEDMAN, Barry. “The Politics of Judicial Review”. New York University Public Law & Legal Theory Research Papers Series, nº 06-04, 2006.
HABERMAS, Jürgen. Comentários à Ética do Discurso. Lisboa: Instituto Piaget, 1991.
______. Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Trad. William Regh. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1996.
______. Inclusão do Outro: Estudos de Teoria Politica. Trad. George Sperber; Paulo Astor Soethe. São Paulo: Loyola, 2002.
______. “Sobre a Legitimação pelos Direitos Humanos.” In: Direito e Legitimidade. MERLE, Jean-Christophe; MOREIRA, Luiz (Org.), São Paulo: Landy, 2003.
HAMILTON, Alexander; MADISON, James; JAY, John. The Federalist Papers. Electronic Classics Series Publication: Pennsylvania State University, 2001.
HOGG, Peter; BUSHELL, Allison. “The CharterDialogue Between Courts and Legislatures.” Osgoode Hall Law Journal, Vol. 35, nº 1, 1997.
MENDES, Conrado. Direitos Fundamentais, Separação dos Poderes e Deliberação. São Paulo: Saraiva Editora, 2011.
PILDES, Richard. “Is the Supreme Court a Majoritarian Institution?” New York University School of Law. Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper Series. Nº 11-01, 2011.
POST, Robert; SIEGEL, Reva. “Roe Rage. Democratic Constitutionalism and Backlash.” Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 2007; Yale Law School, Public Law
Working Paper, nº 131.
RAWLS, John. A Theory of Justice. Revised Edition, Harvard University Press, 1971-1999.
______. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.
______. O Direito dos Povos. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2001.
REGH, William. Translator Introduction. In: HABERMAS, Jürgen, Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Trad. William
Regh. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1996.
ROACH, Kent. The Supreme Court on Trial. Judicial Activism or Democratic Dialogue. Toronto: Irwin Law, 2001.
______. “Dialogic Judicial Review and Its Critics.” Supreme Court Law Review, Vol. 23, 2004.
SUNSTEIN, Cass. The Partial Consitution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.
______. “Deliberation Trouble? Why Groups go to Extremes.” The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 110, nº 71, 2000.
______. A Constitution of Many Minds: Why the Founding Document Doens’t Means What It Meant Before. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009.
WEITHMAN, Paul. Why Political Liberalism? On John Rawls’s Political Turn. Nova York: Oxford University Press, 2010.
VERMEULE, Adrian. Mechanisms of Democracy. Institutional Design Writ Small. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.
BICKEL, Alexander. The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986.
COHEN, Jean; ARATO, Andrew. Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992.
COHEN, Joshua. The Arc of the Moral Universe and other Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011.
DAHL, Robert. “Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as National Policy-Maker.” Journal of Public Law, nº 6, 1957.
FRIEDMAN, Barry. “The Politics of Judicial Review”. New York University Public Law & Legal Theory Research Papers Series, nº 06-04, 2006.
HABERMAS, Jürgen. Comentários à Ética do Discurso. Lisboa: Instituto Piaget, 1991.
______. Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Trad. William Regh. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1996.
______. Inclusão do Outro: Estudos de Teoria Politica. Trad. George Sperber; Paulo Astor Soethe. São Paulo: Loyola, 2002.
______. “Sobre a Legitimação pelos Direitos Humanos.” In: Direito e Legitimidade. MERLE, Jean-Christophe; MOREIRA, Luiz (Org.), São Paulo: Landy, 2003.
HAMILTON, Alexander; MADISON, James; JAY, John. The Federalist Papers. Electronic Classics Series Publication: Pennsylvania State University, 2001.
HOGG, Peter; BUSHELL, Allison. “The CharterDialogue Between Courts and Legislatures.” Osgoode Hall Law Journal, Vol. 35, nº 1, 1997.
MENDES, Conrado. Direitos Fundamentais, Separação dos Poderes e Deliberação. São Paulo: Saraiva Editora, 2011.
PILDES, Richard. “Is the Supreme Court a Majoritarian Institution?” New York University School of Law. Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper Series. Nº 11-01, 2011.
POST, Robert; SIEGEL, Reva. “Roe Rage. Democratic Constitutionalism and Backlash.” Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 2007; Yale Law School, Public Law
Working Paper, nº 131.
RAWLS, John. A Theory of Justice. Revised Edition, Harvard University Press, 1971-1999.
______. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.
______. O Direito dos Povos. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2001.
REGH, William. Translator Introduction. In: HABERMAS, Jürgen, Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Trad. William
Regh. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1996.
ROACH, Kent. The Supreme Court on Trial. Judicial Activism or Democratic Dialogue. Toronto: Irwin Law, 2001.
______. “Dialogic Judicial Review and Its Critics.” Supreme Court Law Review, Vol. 23, 2004.
SUNSTEIN, Cass. The Partial Consitution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.
______. “Deliberation Trouble? Why Groups go to Extremes.” The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 110, nº 71, 2000.
______. A Constitution of Many Minds: Why the Founding Document Doens’t Means What It Meant Before. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009.
WEITHMAN, Paul. Why Political Liberalism? On John Rawls’s Political Turn. Nova York: Oxford University Press, 2010.
VERMEULE, Adrian. Mechanisms of Democracy. Institutional Design Writ Small. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.
Downloads
Publicado
2013-12-30
Como Citar
Bolonha, C., Ganem, F. F., & Zettel, B. (2013). Parâmetros deliberativos para os diálogos constitucionais: Razão pública, ética do discurso e backlash. Revista Brasileira De Direitos Fundamentais & Justiça, 7(25), 170–190. https://doi.org/10.30899/dfj.v7i25.236
Edição
Seção
DOUTRINA NACIONAL
Licença
Para acesso ao conteúdo do periódico, favor entrar em contato com:
Editora Fórum
0800 704 3737
vendas@editoraforum.com.br
